Probabilistic Argumentation Systems with Decision Variables
نویسندگان
چکیده
The general concept of probabilistic argumentation systems PAS is restricted to the two types of variables: assumptions, which model the uncertain part of the knowledge, and propositions, which model the rest of the information. Here, we introduce a third kind into PAS: so-called decision variables. This new kind allows to describe the decisions a user can make to react on some state of the system. Such a decision allows then possibly to reach a certain goal state of the system. Further, we present an algorithm, which exploits the special structure of PAS with decision variables. *
منابع مشابه
Probabilistic Argumentation and Decision System
The concept of probabilistic argumentation systems PAS is restricted to two types of variables: assumptions, which model the uncertain part of the knowledge, and propositions, which model the rest of the information. Instantiations of PAS have been used for dealing with problems in different contexts. Here, we introduce a third kind of variables into PAS: so-called decision variables. This new ...
متن کاملProbabilistic Argumentation for Decision Making A Toolbox and Applications
Argumentation frameworks developed in AI have greatly eased the developments of many kinds of intelligent systems. Recently, to deal with quantitative uncertainties, several authors integrate probabilities into such frameworks to propose probabilistic argumentation frameworks. However, the developments of intelligent systems using these new frameworks are still hindered by the lack of programmi...
متن کاملProbabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with Boltzmann machines
Probabilistic argumentation and neuro-argumentative systems offer new computational perspectives for the theory and applications of argumentation, but their principled construction involve two entangled problems. On the one hand, probabilistic argumentation aims at combining the quantitative uncertainty addressed by probability theory with the qualitative uncertainty of argumentation, but proba...
متن کاملBuilding Argumentation Systems on Set Constraint Logic
The purpose of this paper is to show how the theory of probabilistic argumentation systems can be extended from propositional logic to the more general framework of set constraint logic. The strength of set constraint logic is that logical relations between non-binary variables can be expressed more directly. This simplifies the classical way of modeling knowledge through propositional logic. B...
متن کاملProbabilistic Multi Objective Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Considering Load Uncertainties Using Monte Carlo Simulations
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch (ORPD) is a multi-variable problem with nonlinear constraints and continuous/discrete decision variables. Due to the stochastic behavior of loads, the ORPD requires a probabilistic mathematical model. In this paper, Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is used for modeling of load uncertainties in the ORPD problem. The problem is formulated as a nonlinear constrained mul...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Informatica, Lith. Acad. Sci.
دوره 16 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005